WELCOME TO
THE FIELD REPORT
. . . wherein I try to provide current and useful information about gardening in alkaline clay soils, with special emphasis on the selection, care, and cultivation of roses. Also included is a short list of roses specifically recommended for Texas gardens. On the Rose Rosette page, in addition to a discussion of that dreadful disease and its remedies, you will find photographs of typical symptoms and of the eriophyid mite believed to be responsible for transmitting it.
For anyone interested in organic gardening, I include information regarding the proven, common-sense practice of that worthy endeavor. Unhappily, though, not all sources for this kind of information adhere to scientific principles and practices or even to fundamental rules of professional ethics. And there are a few outright charlatans flinging around a lot of nonsense (or worse) in the name of organic gardening, which often makes it difficult for the average gardener to separate the wheat from the chaff. So, heeding the words of Dr. Marianne Jennings, who once said,
"Truth is violated by falsehood but outraged by silence,"I devote the second portion of this website to informing the visitor about our local source of chaff -- and to the curious and often ludicrous pronouncements of Dallas own mountebank of misinformation, John Howard Garrett, the self-anointed and self-serving "Doctor of Dirt."
Field Roebuck
For Roses and Gardening: Who am I?/Rose Care/Rose Pruning/Rose Rosette/Clay Soil/Recommended Roses
Exposing the Dirt Doctor: Who is he?/Diatomaceous Earth/Lava Sand/Rock Powders/Misinformation/Phil Callahan/Howard's Garden
(Site last updated on April 6, 2006)
(Contributions to help offset the annual cost of providing this website will be graciously accepted and appreciated. Mail them to 6960 Joyce Way, Dallas, Texas 75225. Thank you.)
Note: The rose pictured at the top of this page is 'Better Times,' a once-popular 1934 hybrid tea, which the American Rose Society has dropped from its annual Handbook for Selecting Roses because of an "inferior" rating. It was listed in the 1996 ARS handbook, where it had a rating of 5.2, meaning "of questionable value."
I planted this rose in April, 1959, and that same plant is still there today, blooming beautifully -- and almost continuously. In fact, I took this photo of a flower on that original, 40-year-old rosebush on March 31, 1999. This should tell you something about the usefulness of the ARS ratings system.